There are many different terms that Derrida employs Logocentrism emphasises the privileged role that. Derrida’s logocentrism approach challenges the privileging of speech article, these ideas of Derrida are applied by reading the Logos in the. Logocentrism: deconstruction: Deconstruction in philosophy: a manifestation of the “logocentrism” of Western culture—i.e., the general assumption that there is.
|Published (Last):||27 July 2012|
|PDF File Size:||17.66 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.90 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: This is an extreme example, but Derrida claims derrid such a predicament afflicts all giving in more or less obvious ways.
An undecidable, and there are many of them in deconstruction eg.
Derrida’s Critique of Logocentrism | Literary Theory and Criticism
Logocentriwm refers to the tradition of Western science and philosophy that regards words and language as a fundamental expression of an external reality. This may sound counter-intuitive, but even a simple ‘thank-you’ for instance, which both acknowledges the presence of a gift and also proposes some form of equivalence with that gift, can be seen to annul the gift cf.
It is committed to the rigorous analysis of the literal meaning of a text, and yet also to finding within that meaning, perhaps in the neglected corners of the text including the footnotesinternal problems that actually point towards alternative meanings. The Gift of Deathtrans. Distancing himself from the various philosophical movements and traditions that preceded him on the French intellectual scene phenomenology, existentialism, and structuralismhe developed a strategy called “deconstruction” in the mid s.
This particular paradox revolves around the premise that if one forgives something that is actually forgivable, then one simply logoocentrism in calculative reasoning and hence does not really forgive.
In this way, Derrida believes, he achieves a position beyond absolute knowledge. It follows then that an originary present must bear an originary trace, the present trace of a past which never took place, an absolute past. Reflecting upon tales of Jewish tradition, he highlights logocentgism absolute singularity of responsibility to the other.
Deconstruction often involves a way of reading that concerns itself with decentering—with unmasking the problematic nature of all centers.
Against the metaphysics of presence, deconstruction brings a non concept called differance. For him, the logic of a genuine gift actually requires that self and other be radically disparate, and have no obligations or claims upon each other of any kind. This suggestion that the decision cannot anticipate the future is undoubtedly somewhat counter-intuitive, but Derrida’s rejection of anticipation is not only a rejection of the traditional idea of deciding on the basis of weighing-up and internally representing certain options.
Derrida deconstructs the apparent inner, phonological system of language, stating in Chapter 2, Linguistics and Grammatologythat in fact and for reasons of essence Saussure’s representative determination is ” This is not a trace of lgoocentrism oppositions that have since been deconstructed – on the contrary, the trace derida a rupture within metaphysics, a pattern of incongruities where the metaphysical rubs up against the non-metaphysical, that it is deconstruction’s job to juxtapose as best as it can.
Meaning is always attributed to the object or idea by the human mind, and constructed by and expressed through language: This is not writing narrowly conceived, as in a literal inscription upon a page, but what he terms ‘arche-writing’. Indeed, in retrospectively looking back through classical thought, all major paradigms of knowledge contain a locus, or point of origin.
InDerrida was born into a Jewish family in Algiers. All of these terms of denigration, however, are united under the broad rubric of the term ‘metaphysics’. It is also worth considering the aporia that Derrida associates with hospitality. For Derrida, the paradox of responsible behaviour means that there is always a question of being responsible before a singular other eg. In their use, it was generally employed to describe thinkers preferring speech to writing as communicative technologies.
The idea of difference also brings with it the idea of trace. Significantly, however, according to Derrida, the existential force of this demand for an absolute altruism can never be assuaged, and yet equally clearly it can also never be fulfilled, and this ensures that the condition of the possibility of the gift is inextricably associated with its impossibility. Every present, in order to know itself as present, bears the trace of an absent which defines it.
Derrida speaks of the first aspect of this deconstructive strategy as being akin to a fidelity and a “desire to be faithful to the themes and audacities of a thinking” WD In other words, hospitality also requires non-mastery, and the abandoning of all claims to property, or ownership. Routledge and Kegan Paul, In his explorations of these “possible-impossible” aporias, it becomes undecidable whether genuine giving, for example, is either a possible or an impossible ideal.
Derrida discerns another aporia in regard to whether or not to forgive somebody who has caused us significant suffering or pain. But no term about a relationship so complex will be itself simple, and so this is a dense one.
University of Chicago Press, GT. All erotic relations have their own supplementary aspect in which we are never present to some ephemeral ‘meaning’ of sexual logocentrisk, but always involved in some form of representation.
To phrase the problem logocenhrism slightly different terms, Derrida’s argument is that in examining a derridz opposition, deconstruction manages to expose a trace. Derrida argues that logocentrism may be seen in the theory that a linguistic sign consists of a signifier which derives its meaning from a signified idea or concept. Deconstruction is, somewhat infamously, the philosophy that says nothing. Firstly, he thinks that the phenomenological emphasis upon the immediacy of experience is the new transcendental illusion, and secondly, he argues that despite its best intents, phenomenology cannot be anything other than a metaphysics SP 75, Reynolds Roberto Kutcher W.
Arche-writing is a form of language which is unhindered by the difference between speech and writing.
Derrida’s Critique of Logocentrism
In another attempt to explain deconstruction’s treatment of, and interest in oppositions, Derrida has suggested that: Our predominant mode of being is what he will eventually term the messianic see Section 6in that experience is about the wait, or more aptly, experience is only when it is deferred. In opposition to such an account, he emphasises the “radical singularity” of the demands placed upon Abraham by God GD 60, 68, 79 and those that might be placed on us by our own loved ones.
Structuralism was a theory brought most prominently into literary criticism by Ferdinand de Saussure, who asserted that language and speech can only be understood in the wider context of the schemes they inhabit, and is concerned with defining language as a ubiquitous system.